A CSET data snapshot was highlighted in a New York Times article discussing the challenges faced by the U.S. government in enforcing technology export controls aimed at preventing advanced chip technology from reaching Chinese firms like Huawei, which is under U.S. sanctions.

In his op-ed on The Diplomat, Jacob Feldgoise discusses the geopolitical significance of chips and the U.S. CHIPS and Science Act.

In a GOVCIO CyberCast episode about US-China security threats and cybersecurity risks associated with information and communications technology, Jack Corrigan provided his expert insights.

As the U.S. government tightens its controls on China’s semiconductor ecosystem, a new dimension is increasingly worrying Congress: the open-source chip architecture known as RISC-V (pronounced “risk-five”). This blog post provides an introduction to the RISC-V architecture and an explanation of what policy-makers can do to address concerns about this open architecture.

This guide provides a run-down of CSET’s research since 2019 for first-time visitors and long-term fans alike. Quickly get up to speed on our “must-read” research and learn about how we organize our work.

Existing U.S. government tools and approaches may help mitigate some of the issues worrying AI observers. This blog post describes long-standing “catch-all” controls, administered by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and how they might be used to address some of these threats.

The Wall Street Journal published an opinion article citing two reports: No Permits, No Fabs by CSET's John VerWay and Sustaining and Growing the U.S. Semiconductor Advantage: A Primer by CSET's Owen J. Daniels and Will Hunt.

Emily Weinstein and Tim Hwang discuss decoupling from China in AI.

CSET Data Research Analyst Jacob Feldgoise spoke with Marketplace about U.S. government export restrictions blocking China from access to U.S.-produced emerging technology such as quantum computing and AI software.

A CSET report found that 97 AI chips in China's military purchase records were manufactured by U.S. based firms.