Worth Knowing
OpenAI’s Sam Altman Wants to Raise $7 Trillion to Make Chips: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has been in talks with investors to raise as much as $7 trillion for a project to dramatically expand global chipmaking capacity, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal. Observers handwaved the reported target — more than the market capitalizations of Apple and Microsoft combined — as an act of “showmanship” by Altman, but the story isn’t worth writing off entirely. The generative AI boom has been powered by massive amounts of computing power. Absent a breakthrough in AI training practices, the relationship between computing power and AI sophistication — the more compute, the better the model — means OpenAI will only be able to go as far as its chips can take it. The chip supply is dominated by a handful of companies — namely Nvidia on the chip-design side and TSMC on the manufacturing side — that are already struggling to meet demand. That puts Altman’s company in a precarious position. His reported discussions with investors, including government representatives from the United Arab Emirates and investors from SoftBank, are unlikely to bring in anywhere close to trillions of dollars. Even if they did, some observers noted, Altman would struggle to find the workers and other inputs needed to actually spend the money effectively. But it’s still noteworthy that Altman is trying to find ways to satisfy his company’s massive computing power appetite that aren’t wholly reliant on Nvidia.
Expert Take: “Sam Altman’s fundraising plans are incredibly ambitious and likely will face a number of challenges. In particular, wrangling the motivations and interests of involved stakeholders, including governments, semiconductor fabrication companies, design companies, private investors, and customers will be a key obstacle. Additionally, the geopolitical implications would be significant as involvement from U.A.E.-based investors would likely draw scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers and government officials. That being said, it is too early to say to what extent Altman will be able to accomplish his goals, as there are still many outstanding questions.” — Hanna Dohmen, Research Analyst
- More: Exclusive: Nvidia pursues $30 billion custom chip opportunity with new unit | Chip race: Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Nvidia battle it out for AI chip supremacy
- More: China may be making more advanced chips despite U.S. sanctions — but it still faces big problems | Netherlands Blocks ASML Exports of Some Chip-Making Equipment to China
Government Updates
FTC Looks into Big Tech Deals with OpenAI and Anthropic: The FTC announced it had launched an inquiry into investments in two of the world’s hottest AI upstarts — OpenAI and Anthropic — made by three big tech icons — Microsoft, Amazon, and Google. According to the FTC, it is hoping to gather information about the strategic rationale behind the investments and about how the transactions will impact market share and competition in the AI sector. While none of the investing companies holds a majority interest in the two AI labs, their investments have been significant — Microsoft has backed OpenAI to the tune of $13 billion, while Amazon and Google have committed $4 billion and $2 billion to Anthropic, respectively. The inquiry doesn’t necessarily mean that antitrust action is coming, but observers say it’s part of putting the companies on notice that their actions are on the FTC’s radar. The FTC isn’t alone in probing the relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft. Across the Atlantic, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority launched an inquiry in December, and the EU is probing whether the relationship might need a closer review under its merger rules.
DIU Looks to Enter New Phase with “Strategic Effect”: In a report published earlier this month, the head of the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Unit laid out his vision for the organization’s next phase, which he dubbed “DIU 3.0.” DIU Director Doug Beck’s report, published in partnership with the Center for a New American Security, outlines a plan to take the lessons learned during the DIU’s first eight years and “apply them with the focus, scale, and speed necessary to deliver the strategic effect required.” Established in 2015 (originally as “DIUx”), DIU was stood up to help the military adopt cutting-edge commercial technologies. As Beck’s report explains, the organization’s first eight years were largely spent laying the foundation: establishing relationships between the Pentagon and the tech world (DIU’s headquarters are in Silicon Valley) and proving that commercial tech can meet the DOD’s needs. Now, Beck writes, DIU needs to begin focusing on delivering “at the scale required for strategic effect.” The DOD’s Replicator Initiative — its “moonshot” plan, announced last August, to field thousands of attritable autonomous systems across multiple domains within 18 to 24 months — will be an important test case for DIU’s ability to deliver at that type of scale. That timeline was deliberately ambitious, but DIU officials say the initiative is on track to meet the targets set last year.
DOD’s AI Office Kicks Off a Public “AI Bias Bounty” Exercise: On January 27, the Pentagon’s lead AI office, the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO), launched its first “AI Bias Bounty” exercise to identify bias and unknown risks in large language models (LLMs). The DOD has used bounty programs before to help identify cyber risks, but this exercise marks the first time it has applied the concept to AI. The crowdsourced effort is open to the public, and participants can earn a share of a $24,000 pot for their work. Last August, the DOD launched an effort — dubbed Task Force Lima — to “assess, synchronize, and employ” generative AI tools, including LLMs, across the DOD. The Pentagon says the AI Bias Bounty exercises are meant to help develop “novel approaches” to auditing and red-teaming AI systems. The current exercise will run until February 27, and a second exercise will be announced soon.
Commerce Takes Steps to Set up U.S. AI Safety Institute: Last week, the Commerce Department took key steps toward setting up the new U.S. AI Safety Institute. The AISI, initially announced last November, is tasked with leading the U.S. government’s AI trust and safety efforts, operationalizing NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF), and developing technical guidance for regulators. On February 7, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo named Elizabeth Kelly as AISI’s inaugural director and Elham Tabassi as its first chief technology officer. Kelly will take over the role after serving two years on the White House National Economic Council, while Tabassi is a long-tenured veteran of NIST, which will house AISI, where she played a key role in developing its AI RMF. On February 8, Raimondo announced the creation of the U.S. AI Safety Institute Consortium, comprising more than 200 companies and organizations, including CSET. According to NIST, the AISIC will help achieve some of the priorities laid out in President Biden’s 2023 AI Executive Order, including setting guidelines for AI red-teaming, risk management, and watermarking.
In Translation
CSET’s translations of significant foreign language documents on AI
CSET’s translations of significant foreign language documents on AI
PRC Future Industries: Implementation Opinions of Seven Ministries Including the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on Promoting the Innovative Development of Future Industries. This Chinese government document identifies “future industries” in six areas — manufacturing, IT, materials, energy, space, and health — as priorities for China’s industrial policy. The document names quantum computing and brain-inspired technologies, in particular, as areas of focus, and assigns a prominent role to Chinese central government-owned enterprises in developing these future technologies.
Shenzhen AI Industry Plan: Certain Measures of the Qianhai Shenzhen-Hong Kong Modern Service Industry Cooperation Zone Management Bureau to Support the High-Quality Development and High-Level Application of Artificial Intelligence. This regulation describes various financial and policy incentives that Qianhai District in southern China’s Shenzhen City is taking to promote the growth of its AI industry. It is one example of the types of subsidies and other supportive policies that Chinese local governments take to attract and incubate AI companies, often in competition with other localities.
If you have a foreign-language document related to security and emerging technologies that you’d like translated into English, CSET may be able to help! Click here for details.
Job Openings
We’re hiring! Please apply or share the role below with candidates in your network:
- Research Fellow – Workforce: We are currently seeking candidates to support our Workforce line of research as a Research Fellow. In this role, you will be a key player in helping us accomplish three major research tasks: updating CSET’s assessment of the U.S. AI workforce, executing an analysis of the U.S. cybersecurity workforce, and assessing the U.S. educational pipeline for AI, cybersecurity, and STEM talent. As a report to our Senior Fellow who leads this research area, you will play a key role in shaping research priorities, overseeing research strategy and its execution, and leading a talented team of researchers. If you’re passionate about technology policy and possess strong leadership skills, apply now to make a meaningful impact on the future of America’s Workforce. Apply by Monday, March 4th
What’s New at CSET
PUBLICATIONS
- CSET: RISC-V: What It Is and Why It Matters by Jacob Feldgoise
- CSET: China’s Hybrid Economy: What to Do about BGI? by Anna Puglisi
- Lawfare: How the United States Can Set International Norms for Military Use of AI by Lauren Kahn
- Brennan Center for Justice: Deepfakes, Elections, and Shrinking the Liar’s Dividend by Josh A. Goldstein and Andrew Lohn
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY OBSERVATORY
- The Emerging Technology Observatory is now on Substack! Sign up for all the latest updates and analysis.
- Editors’ Picks from ETO Scout: Volume 6 (1/12/24-1/25/24)
- Editors’ Picks from ETO Scout: Volume 7 (1/26/24-2/8/24)
EVENT RECAPS
- U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission: Senior Research Analysts Jack Corrigan and Ngor Luong testified before the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission for its February 1 hearing on “Current and Emerging Technologies in U.S.-China Economic and National Security Competition.” Read Corrigan’s testimony for Panel I: Risks of Chinese Information Technology Products in the United States and Luong’s testimony for Panel III: China’s Progress in Commercial Applications of Selected Emerging Technologies.
- CSET Webinar: On January 31, CSET’s Heather Frase, Jack Corrigan, Luke Koslosky, and Margarita Konaev conducted a 90-day review of the ongoing implementation of the Biden Administration’s executive order on artificial intelligence, discussing what the U.S. government has accomplished so far, what has been learned, and what’s left to do to complete the EO’s ambitious goals.
IN THE NEWS
- Axios: Biotech is the new focus in U.S.-China tech rivalry (Alison Snyder quoted Anna Puglisi)
- BBC World Service: The race to secure semiconductor supply chains (Hannah Mullane spoke to Hanna Dohmen)
- Bloomberg: The U.S. Could Learn Something From China’s Spy Tactics (Andrew Martin quoted William Hannas)
- CNBC: Google says Singapore has ‘very high’ potential to be a global AI hub (Sheila Chiang cited the CSET report Examining Singapore’s AI Progress)
- GZero Media: Sam Altman’s wish on a $7 trillion star (Scott Nover quoted Hanna Dohmen)
- Newsweek: Exclusive: Pentagon Faces Questions for Funding Top Chinese AI Scientist (Didi Kirsten Tatlow quoted William Hannas)
- South China Morning Post: U.S. replacement of Chinese IT equipment will cost billions of dollars more, analysts say (Ji Siqi quoted Jack Corrigan)
- The Wall Street Journal: One of Biden’s Favorite Chip Projects Is Facing New Delays (Yang Jie and Yuka Hayashi quoted Jacob Feldgoise)
- Time: How Tech Giants Turned Ukraine Into an AI War Lab (Vera Bergengruen quoted Margarita Konaev)
What We’re Reading
Paper: AI-Powered Patching: The Future of Automated Vulnerability Fixes, Jan Keller and Jan Nowakowski, Google (January 2024)
Article: Automation Does Not Lead to Leaner Land Forces, Jack Watling, War on the Rocks (February 2024)
Upcoming Events
- February 27: CSET Webinar, Tech Firms in Ukraine: The Role of U.S. Companies and Implications for the Future, featuring Emelia Probasco, Sam Bresnick, and Ngor Luong
What else is going on? Suggest stories, documents to translate & upcoming events here.