And the Quad’s ability to succeed has been called into question by think tank the Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET), which this week released a brief assessing the Quad’s past collaborations.

The brief found systemic problems.

According to CSET, the Quad could “offer an alternative to China’s techno-authoritarian model of technology development and use,” but it faces non-negligible barriers like “different approaches to data governance, varying economic and technological capabilities, and divergent geopolitical priorities.”

Read the full article at The Register.